|
|
|
 |

Año should resign

Teachers in Libmanan Central School in Libmanan, Camarines Sur,
were found out collecting money during the recognition day in the
same school on March 28, 2005. It appeared that the awardees,
naturally through their hard put parents, were to give unspecified
amount right after the awarding of pupils to a teacher acting like
a guardia civil at the foot of the stairs.
Consequently, Dr. Lucita Año, public schools division
superintendent in Camarines Sur, was sought for in the blatant
violation of the DepEd Memo No. 8 prohibiting the collection of
contributions other than those prescribed by law by the teachers.
Año could hardly be contacted. Now the question arises: is the
superintendent a party to this irregularity? If she is, she should
resign. How can she be not an accomplice to this corrupt design
when Año has “command responsibility” to acts and conditions
prevailing in all the schools under the division.
First and foremost, teachers, especially in the elementary and
secondary levels, lurk in the ambit of surrogatus, substitute
parents. They are expected to take care of the young befitting the
relationship of a parent to a child. When this is disturbed within
the confines of that authority, the disturbance is more the
liability of the former than of the latter.
While Año is appointed as a superintendent, she never loses her
fundamental character as teacher. As a matter of fact, the wider
obligation she has, for by the nature of her office, it transforms
her to be the surrogate of surrogates, collectively.
It’s true that recognition of exemplary accomplisments of pupils
is a regular motivation to pupils to recognize the value of good
work. This is an incentive system that has worked in education to
no small measure. The reward from simple ribbons to well-funded
scholarships, in most cases, triggers further reinforcement to
pupils, awardees or not, to perform better.
And here lies the catch. The award should not be tainted by any
mumbo jumbo where the intended beneficiary becomes the victim. The
young pupils just became that when they were asked some money when
awarded.
They are forced to enter a culture of distrust which is not of
their doing but that of their “substitute parents.” Add to that
the many more obscurities and mistakes that are to be laid in
their later school days, say in college, if ever they reach that
point. Presto, education could make Frankensteins of these poor
souls. They could become defiant and excellent candidates for the
brain drain that has been bleeding and plaguing the country dry of
precious human resource since time immemorial.
So that, the work of Año as superintendent of the entire public
school system in the province is very critical. She could not
merely dismiss in disregard a reporter for doing his job by
calling on her to clarify the malfeasance happening at the
Libmanan Central School or to a large part the media. This is even
contrary to the ongoing concerns of the Manila DepEd to enlist
every probable ally to the benefit of education and to support
every possible move to improve the lot of school children.
Well, if Año cannot do just that in the bidding of Sec. Florencio
Abad, the former has no business to be a superintendent a minute
more.
|
|
|