HOME ADVERTISE ARCHIVES FEEDBACK LINKS SIGN GUESTBOOK VIEW GUESTBOOK

SEARCH

The Web   
Enhanced by: GoogleTM


 
 FEATURE

A Pastoral Statement
 PEOPLE & EVENTS

A taste of STAR BACS in Masbate
 

Ateneo celebrates University Month
 

Naga Parochial School celebrates 60th year
 

Pictures
 BICOL NEWS

POC laban na sa jueteng: Resolucion ipapadara ki PNP chief Lomibao
 

Naga sagcod sana sa Palarong Bicol 2006
 

ARD Dayao nagribay ki Torres
 

Negocianteng intsik kasabuat sa human smuggling
 

Cho, napiling chairman kan Aksyon Democratico
 

Casureco IV na "wow mali" kan NEA audit
 

Sinapak gapo, lalaki gadan
 
 EDITORIAL BOARD
 


Leon SA. Aureus
(1908-1969)
Founder

Nilo P. Aureus

 

Publisher

Jose B. Perez

 

Editor-in-Chief

Daniel P. Aureus

 

Bikol Editor

Liberato S. Aureus

 

Editorial Consultant

Bicol Mail Staff

 Advertisement


 










> Chutzpah

ARE they simply facetious or downright ignorant of the issue? And yet the three stooges and their ilk that an exasperated Bicol Mail reader has rebuked for their braggadocio are not about to rest their case.

I am referring to a new twist that came out of the Plaza Rizal issue, or is it Plaza Rizal ballyhoo?

Last week, provincial assessor Anacita Malali claimed that the three plazas located in the heart of Naga City are owned by the provincial government. What!!?? The three plazas as prospective “tiangge?” Holy smokes! (Susmaryosep! for you).

The case about the plazas, specifically about Plaza Rizal, to our reckoning, is not about ownership but about who should have administrative and supervisory control over these public domains which nobody owns but the people.

In its decision dated June 28, 2004, the Twelfth Division of the Court of Appeals, thru Associate Justice Roberto A. Barrios, has denied due course and dismissed a petition for certiorari filed by the Camarines Sur provincial government after Branch 61 of the Regional Trial Court here twice disapproved their appeal to reverse its March 10, 1999 decision declaring that “the administrative control and management of Plaza Rizal is within the City of Naga and not with the Province of Camarines Sur.”

In denying the provincial government’s petition that virtually upheld the lower court’s decision, the Court of Appeals quoted one of the provisions of the old Administrative Code of the Philippine Islands where it was provided that: “When a township or other local territorial division is converted or fused into a municipality all property rights vested in the original territorial organization shall become vested in the government of the municipality.” (Chapter 57, Article 1, ACPI).

When Naga was converted from municipality into a city, all properties under its territorial jurisdiction including Plaza Rizal was vested upon it, Justice Barrios averred, which without saying also applies to Plaza Quince Martires and Plaza Quezon which are presently under the administrative and supervisory control of the city government.

Not wanting to sulk in defeat, the provincial government, however, elevated the case to the Supreme Court praying that the final decision would fall in their favor.

As everyone knows, the stand-off on who shall manage the plaza has become the source of conflict between the two LGUs. The Court of Appeals, in its decision, reminded everyone that “Naga does not ask that it be declared its owner, but it wants though that administrative control and management of Plaza Rizal should be vested in it because this property is situated within its territorial jurisdiction.”

Recalling the case, Camarines Sur filed a motion for reconsideration following the RTC decision which the same court denied. The provincial government then filed a notice of appeal, but was again rebuffed “for non-compliance with the Material Data Rule”. A second notice of appeal was filed on Sept. 13, 1999, but this too was “again disapproved”.

Its attempts to appeal having been unsuccessful, Camarines Sur resorted to a petition for certiorari which the Court of Appeals, you guessed it, dismissed.

* * *
When Pres. Gloria Macapagal Arroyo was handed the cellphone by her hubby FG Mike to congratulate boxing champ Manny Paquiao inside the ring shortly after the heart-pumping victory by the Filipino boxing icon, I felt a mischievous smile curled on my lips. It sounded like the whole world was listening to the haunting “Hello Garci” instead of “Hello Manny” congratulatory chat, bugged or unbugged. A few minutes later, when FG was finally handed back his cellphone, the President’s husband bid goodbye in the romantic Spanish words, “Amor, te quiero mucho.” At that moment, I can imagine the wiretapper giggling, blurting “Oh, how sweet naman”, assuming that this guy knows his Spanish 101.

Someone from Manila, who obviously wanted to get the pulse of the countryside on the political situation obtaining, wondered until when GMA can hold on. Quickly I told her: She would be out before the 2007 polls, or immediately after that. Not necessarily because the opposition substantially won, but because the people have been too much incensed and galvanized to make a decisive uproar against another round of massive cheating, votebuying, and blatant machinations by those in power. This is not to say that old and new issues would be raised more openly during the campaigns. I emphasized that the Filipino people, overly saddled with recurring crisis and scandals could not afford another blatant depredation of their right to choose lesser evils even if it weren’t a presidential election.

After we prayed that Manny Pacquiao should win against Erik Morales, let us double our prayers that he won’t run in the 2007 elections. Blame too much media hype that bamboozled Pacquiao’s battered brain. They first gave us Noli de Castro for vice-president, one reason why GMA hangs on. Now they want us to coddle Pacquiao, too.

 OPINION
Editorial
Blue & White
Selda Numero 10
Doctor Explain
Naga Consumer Watch
Siling Labuyo
Santigwar
Cagrit nin Cowaw
 Letters to the Editors
Stop greed
Cordero reader

 Advertisement

 

Copyright ©2004 Bicol Mail. All Rights Reserved.