LOOKING GLASS
Sandy Vargas
Spoken English
Spoken English is considerably taking much of the concerns of
foreign employers in English-speaking communities when hiring
Filipino workers. To us, this used to be a matter we were bothered
least. Our system of education is basically American; why take
communication a problem?
Yes, this is true to a limited degree nowadays. Instruction in
exclusive schools speaks of it, and not with the greater number of
our students who are taught with insurmountable inadequacies.
Public education is more or less that.
It all started when non-educators like politicians began to tell
educators what to do. Remove this budget and this and that. Do
teach this and this and that. And the stupid teacher followed in
order not to displease another moron for almost every known
personal reason. To cut the story short, both died and left behind
was the graduate made in their own likeness.
Mind you, they did not only decrease the units of English in
college. They even kicked out speech from some curricula and
maintained a practice where any tertiary finisher could teach
English. If you were the student, most probably you’d say that
apprenticeship in the 18th century would be more productive.
Kidding aside, our trouble with spoken English is our ordinary
relationship with the language. Language scientists term it
instrumental, that is, there are very limited activities to where
we use English. They are, for instance, in the school, in the
church, and more scarcely while viewing movies and listening to
music and a few others. Good that you participate when majority
don’t: that’s the take.
I could remember my friends in the Ateneo would have wonderful
time with Shakespearean plays. When off from classes, we’d watch a
Yul Brynner, or a Richard Burton, or a Charlton Heston movie. We’d
mimic them afterwards, like the “Ten Commandments,” Heston (as
Moses): “If there is one more plague on Egypt, it is by your word
God will break it, and there will be more crimes throughout the
land, so let the people go!” Brynner (as Pharaoh): “Come to me to
no more Moses, from the day you see my face, again, you will
surely die!” With some others, it made us members of debating
teams and candidates in student organizations and helped in our
command of the spoken English.
It did not stop there. I fell in love with English and majored on
it in my bachelor’s degree, my master’s but not in my doctoral: I
reserved it for earning my daily bread. What I’m trying to point
out is, you’ll never be fairly good at something unless you make
an attachment to it, and spoken English is simply that.
When I taught some Asians as Chinese, Taiwanese, Thais, Koreans
and several others in a popular school in Manila they thought I
had the “it”. In Australia, I did it to kids in their native
language. In the US, not so literate Americans looked at me as
special because of my spoken English. You see, you can hide your
weakness in this place without being a TNT.
It gives you a sufficient amount of leverage abroad. So, why not
start to shape up in that aspect of the language. It could pay
much dividends.
Specializing in the American English is the better way. Reading
can help you. Speaking requires you to present ideas. Form with no
content is like aiming the riffle with no bullet. Aside, you
improve form.
From one friend to another, if you’ve some sort of
understandability in speech, work on your rhythm. Accentuate
stressed syllables and make them recur regularly within a thought
group; weaken their unstressed counterparts and obscure their
vowels; organize utterance into thought groups by means of pauses;
blend the sound within said groups; and, fit the sentence into an
intonation pattern. Then practice and practice and practice.
Automacity is your final test.